
Supporting Literacy in Children with Hearing Impairment: A Comprehensive Guide for Queensland Families
When your child receives a diagnosis of hearing impairment, one of the first concerns that naturally emerges relates to their…

University represents one of life’s most demanding transitions. For the first time, young adults must independently manage competing deadlines, organise complex schedules across multiple subjects, initiate study without external prompts, and sustain focus in environments filled with unprecedented distractions. While some students navigate these challenges instinctively, many others find themselves overwhelmed—not because they lack intelligence or motivation, but because the cognitive skills required to coordinate these demands haven’t fully developed.
Executive function refers to a set of higher-order cognitive processes managed primarily by the prefrontal cortex—the brain region that continues developing well into a person’s mid-twenties. Research consistently identifies three core components that serve as the foundation for academic success:
Working memory enables students to hold information in mind whilst using it to complete tasks, retain multi-step instructions, and mentally manipulate information. This allows coordination of multiple academic demands simultaneously—taking notes whilst listening to lectures, holding essay arguments in mind whilst writing, or following complex problem-solving sequences.
Inhibitory control represents the capacity to suppress inappropriate responses, resist temptations, filter distractions, and maintain focus on task-relevant information despite competing stimuli. For university students, this includes resisting social media during study sessions, maintaining focus through lengthy lectures, and controlling impulses that might derail long-term goals.
Cognitive flexibility provides the ability to adapt thinking, switch between tasks, view problems from different perspectives, and adjust strategies when circumstances change. Students with strong cognitive flexibility can transition between subjects effectively, approach problems creatively, and recover from setbacks.
Higher-order functions including planning, reasoning, problem-solving, and metacognition build upon these foundational components. Research demonstrates that executive functions predict both mathematics and reading competence throughout school years, with one meta-analysis finding particularly strong correlations between executive function and mathematical abilities. Notably, executive function accounts for more than twice the variation in final grades compared to IQ alone—even at the tertiary level.
University environments present unique demands that expose executive function weaknesses in ways that structured secondary schooling often masks. Between 70-95% of college students report procrastinating in their courses, with academic procrastination and achievement showing a significant negative relationship. When students submit assignments after deadlines, research indicates approximately 49-56% receive failing grades.
Task initiation and procrastination represent some of the most visible manifestations. Students struggle to begin assignments without delay, often underestimating task duration whilst overvaluing immediate leisure—a phenomenon known as temporal discounting. This is not laziness; it is a failure in self-regulation and emotion regulation rather than simple time management.
Organisation and materials management challenges become apparent when students lose important documents, maintain disorganised workspaces, or struggle to organise materials across multiple subjects. The absence of external structure that characterised secondary school exposes these vulnerabilities.
Time management difficulties emerge as students confront heavy reading loads, frequent examinations, and long-term projects. Breaking large assignments into manageable steps, determining priorities, and creating realistic timelines become significant obstacles.
Working memory challenges impact note-taking, following complex instructions, and retaining lecture content. Students may find it difficult to hold multiple pieces of information in mind simultaneously, affecting their ability to synthesise material and coordinate research and writing tasks.
Sustained attention deficits make maintaining focus during long lectures or study sessions particularly difficult, especially in digital environments with abundant distractions. Research indicates that executive dysfunction can create a cycle where poor executive function impacts wellbeing, which further impairs cognitive control.
Executive function coaching for university students is a specialised process emphasising goal-setting, self-reflection, and continuous improvement. Unlike tutoring—which focuses on academic content—or traditional advising—which centres on degree planning, coaching addresses the underlying cognitive processes and self-management skills that enable academic success.
The coaching model is built on three foundational assumptions: most people have a range of executive skill strengths and weaknesses; identifying these weaknesses aids in devising strategies to overcome them; and, through repeated practice with support, anyone can develop these abilities until they become second nature.
This coaching is not traditional tutoring, academic advising, homework enforcement, or therapy. Instead, it involves personalised strategy development, accountability systems, skill-building in key executive function domains, metacognitive development, goal-setting frameworks, and environmental modifications to support self-management.
Systematic reviews and quantitative research provide robust evidence of coaching effectiveness. Students receiving coaching demonstrate significantly higher retention rates, persistence, and improved grades compared to non-coached students. For example, coached graduate students in online programmes were 2.66 times more likely to be retained than their non-coached counterparts.
Coaching results in improved goal-setting, increased motivation, reduced educational stress, enhanced metacognitive awareness, and better personal relationships. These benefits extend beyond university, contributing to workplace success and independent living.
Evidence-based coaching strategies are tailored to individual student needs. For instance, time management and planning interventions may include calendar systems, time-blocking techniques, and methods such as the Pomodoro technique. Organisation strategies might involve setting up colour-coded systems and designated storage areas to prevent loss of important materials.
Working memory support may involve external tools like reminders and structured note-taking systems. Strategies for emotional regulation include stress management techniques, healthy routine development, and self-care practices. Additionally, study skills and academic engagement strategies—ranging from active reading to spaced repetition—play a crucial role, especially for students with conditions like ADHD.
Australian universities increasingly recognise the need for comprehensive support beyond traditional counselling. Executive function coaching fills an important gap by developing the practical skills that help students utilise other supports—such as disability services or academic tutoring—more effectively. Integration can occur via referral pathways where counselling or academic centres identify students who would benefit from coaching, particularly those facing challenges related to ADHD or learning disabilities.
The developmental timeline of executive function underscores why university students require support. Although these cognitive skills begin developing in infancy, the prefrontal cortex is not fully mature until the mid-twenties. Secondary schooling provides structured support that university life typically lacks, leaving many students exposed to challenges in task initiation, planning, and self-regulation.
For students managing learning disorders or ADHD, the absence of external structure coupled with ongoing brain development can compound academic struggles. Executive function coaching offers targeted support to bridge these gaps and foster long-term success.
By reframing academic struggles as challenges of skill development rather than lack of intelligence or motivation, executive function coaching paves the way for sustainable improvement. Students learn to develop self-awareness and self-advocacy, equipping them with skills that extend well beyond university assignments to benefit workplace performance and independent living. This holistic approach, especially when integrated with literacy interventions for those with learning disorders, lays the foundation for lifelong success.
Executive function coaching addresses the underlying cognitive processes and self-management skills that enable academic success, rather than teaching specific subject content or planning degree pathways. Whilst tutoring helps students understand course material and academic counselling assists with course selection and degree planning, executive function coaching develops skills including time management, organisation, task initiation, planning, working memory strategies, and emotional regulation. These foundational capabilities allow students to utilise tutoring more effectively, complete assignments independently, and implement their degree plans successfully. Research demonstrates that coaching involves personalised strategy development, accountability systems, and repeated practice of skills in real-world contexts, producing lasting improvements in academic performance and self-management abilities.
Whilst all university students can benefit from strengthening executive function skills, research indicates particular benefit for several populations. Students with ADHD represent approximately 78% of those receiving collegiate coaching services and show significant improvements in retention, grades, and overall functioning. Students with learning disabilities including dyslexia demonstrate executive function deficits alongside their literacy challenges, benefiting from coordinated support. Academically at-risk students show particularly large improvements, with research documenting GPA increases of 0.55 points compared to 0.12 points for students in good standing. First-generation students, international students adjusting to different academic systems, and students experiencing anxiety or depression alongside academic struggles also demonstrate significant coaching benefits. Students experiencing persistent procrastination, organisational challenges, or difficulty managing multiple academic demands represent ideal candidates regardless of diagnosis.
Research indicates that effective coaching interventions must span at least 12 hours over a minimum of four weeks, with most successful programmes lasting at least one full semester. Students attending three or more coaching sessions show average GPA increases of 0.3-0.5 points within a single semester. However, meaningful skill development requires continuity—research suggests that at least one semester of coaching allows new strategies and skills to become established habits. For students on academic probation, even a single coaching visit associates with a 0.39-point GPA increase, with additional visits producing incremental improvements. The timeline varies based on individual challenges, goals, and engagement level, but students typically notice improvements in organisation and time management within weeks, whilst more complex skills including metacognition and self-regulation develop over months of consistent practice.
Executive function coaching provides valuable support for students with learning disorders, as research demonstrates significant overlap between these conditions. Students with dyslexia demonstrate deficits in multiple executive function domains including verbal fluency, attention, working memory, and planning—challenges that can be as significant as reading difficulties in affecting academic performance. Executive function coaching complements literacy interventions by developing organisational systems for managing reading assignments, time management strategies that account for longer reading times, and planning approaches that break complex assignments into manageable steps. For students working with services addressing their learning disorders, such as those available through The Learning & Literacy Clinic, executive function coaching represents an important component of comprehensive support. The combination of building foundational academic skills whilst developing the executive function capabilities to apply those skills effectively produces optimal outcomes.
Research demonstrates that executive function coaching delivered via online video conferencing is equally effective as in-person sessions. Online delivery provides several advantages including flexible scheduling to accommodate academic timetables, accessibility for students across Southeast Queensland including those in the Bay Islands and regional areas, reduced commuting time allowing more frequent sessions, and comfortable home environments potentially reducing anxiety about seeking support. The critical factors for coaching effectiveness include individual rather than group sessions, a minimum duration of 12 hours over four weeks, professional coach facilitation, and regular accountability check-ins—all achievable through online platforms. Graduate students in online programmes who received coaching were 2.66 times more likely to be retained than non-coached students, demonstrating online coaching effectiveness. For students balancing university, work, and family commitments, online coaching removes accessibility barriers whilst maintaining effectiveness.